Documenting from Scotland the rise of the One World King; the "masonic" Sun God.

Thursday, 25 September 2008

Three-sum





















Archibald has asked me for the night off and I really had to agree; in the interim another lovely numerical synchronicity regarding the meeting between Western govern-mental leaders George W Bush and Gordon Brown, this coming Friday.

Regular readers will know my suspicions of the ritualistic use of the number 27 by those who seek to enslave us further as humans, 27 being 3 cubed or 3x3x3 - three itself being the "mystical" number to those of a domineering occult persuasion and one that I myself fight an ongoing compulsive disorder with.

Returning to Friday though, note the beautiful sequence for this most important union:

26/09/2008, or sub totalling individual digits, 8 - 9 - 10 their sum 27.

We glean the time of the meeting too from the BBC report, 2120BST, or 9.20PM British Time. 20 minutes is a third of an hour and nine is three squared, not forgetting the possible 9-11 connotation.

cheers

please see my post on the Treaty of Lisbon for more on this subject
also, America's PAST time is very relevant from a sporting angle

11 comments:

FilmNoir23 said...

Great! Thanks as always...have you been keeping tabs on this full on circus over there mate?

Warren Buffett calls on the old Pearl Harbor reference today which should speak volumes about what is going on here...

dynamitrios said...

Oh Boy^^. Again this stuff is fucking my head big time.

So it is numerology and symbols and you trained your mind recognizing an seeing it. Now what?

What is "THEIR" (tm) intensions. Cruel cosmic joke, or total and eternal enslavement?
And why "THEY" (tm) didn´t manage to break us by now? Are we stronger than "THEY"(tm) thought, or are "THEY" (tm) weaker than we expect them to be?
Whatevere it is though we win, in any of the two cases. We are the winners and we always were, because when it comes to the finals, "THEY" (tm) will face a pretty angry mob (i.e. "US"), because they are outnumbered (out"numbered", got it? ;-) )

Don´t get me wrong, i appreciate what you guys do, but your writings seem so full of doom and despair. You need to be more sanguine.

Greetings from Germany

dynamitrios said...

P.s. Edit for typos. It´s "intentions"

Newspaceman said...

Sorry dynamitrios, where do yuo obtain the "training my mind" suggestion from. I don't "train" my mind - perhaps you do though - or perhaps it has been trained for you.

"Their" intentions are enslavement of humanity - do you actually believe that we are supposed to work all the hours God sends and the majority of the years of our lives and if so, why are we supposed to. To use the our wealth (an excess of work over necessity) have wars and send humans to space ?

"Whatever it is we win" because of a "pretty angry mob". I have seen pretty angry mobs at the football and being honest, they are no match for the authorities in full riot gear, water cannon etc. Also, look at the G8's - it was like an army when they had it up here.

Finally - "I am glad that you appreciate what "you guys?" do,.. I need to be more sanguine."

Unfortunately, comments such as your's leave me in no such state, you need tom give yourself a shake.

cheers though, brian

FilmNoir23 said...

I live pretty much a happy life and enjoy mine to the fullest as much as I am able...I'm getting pretty tired of the "New Age", Hippy, whatever trip it is YOU are on types suggesting that I/we are are on doom crusade of some sort...I think we are merely being realistic looking at the world as it stands...symbolism or not the writing appears to be all over the walls, and the floors & ceilings...

If you'd rather bury your heads, go ahead...

What I write about and cover is one thing...but HONESTLY you don't know anything about my personal life or what makes me tick as a person.

SORRY for the rant...newspaceman. These sorts of comments are become more frequent and they bore me.

dynamitrios said...

My comment was supposed to be a slight critique. Didn´t mean to offend anybody. But you guys seem to take that pretty personally. which again gives me the impression of some "personal crusade".
No reason to react angry
A reaction like this let´s me think of Dogma again.
We already have enough elitist jerks in this world, who think of their beliefs to be the only thruth there is.
My point was that if you focus your mind too much on symbols and ritual then thats what you gonna see. Even if there is or not. We think seeing is believing, but in reality we´re far better in believing than in seeing :)in fact, most of the time we "see" what we "believe". Its a "neurological relativism": Every person creates it´s own tunnel-reality which suits it´s "neurological habits" best. Bottom line: Everything you believe limits yourself
And yes, I too believe that there is a ritual going on out there which is supposed to enslave humanity.
But honestly? Atm i see "US" (humanity) on the winning track, why, i can´t say.. It just feels that way. No matter what i "see" or "believe"

Please no hard feelings

Greetings from Germany

Newspaceman said...

If you write a comment to me, obviously I am going to take it personally - if it is not meant meant for me personally, then please don't bother writing it.

My belief about enslavement of humanity you obviously concur with and as I said, I don't focus on symbols - you obviously did not read my reply properly

As regards this:

But honestly? Am i see "US" (humanity) on the winning track, why, i can´t say.. It just feels that way. No matter what i "see" or "believe"

Yes, we hear the same shite from a variety of sources - a oneness, the new age etc. etc. -

You are deluded - keep to facts and I might have some respect for what you write; your opinions have no substance as far as I can see, and you have written nothing to change my mind

Being honest, you work for the other side - that is patently obvious

cheers though, I lok forward to hearing some evidence for your way of "thinking" - if that is what you call it.

brian

Newspaceman said...

PS -this is mumbo jumbo to me dynamitrios, can you clarify/expand/substantiate please:

"We think seeing is believing, but in reality we´re far better in believing than in seeing :)in fact, most of the time we "see" what we "believe". Its a "neurological relativism": Every person creates it´s own tunnel-reality which suits it´s "neurological habits" best."

cheers though,

brian

Dynamitrios said...

1. [/quote] and you have written nothing to change my mind[/quote]
I don´t intend to change anyones mind. That would be manipulative.
A rational discussion is something different from "I am rigth, you´re not"

2.[/quote]Yes, we hear the same shite from a variety of sources - a oneness, the new age etc. etc. -
[/quote]
Never mentioned that. This is what you interpreted in my writing. I merely have a positive feeling in life thats all. But i have to admit that this just counts for myself and i´m not claiming that it is a common feeling everybody has (i can´t stand New-Agers/ hippies myself, they´re too dogmatic)

3. [/quote]Being honest, you work for the other side - that is patently obvious[/quote]

Now that made my day. No further comment on this. Except: Lighten up buddy. Without knowing me personally, this is a pretty heavy insult to make. I work for "my" side (wanna join? we have hash cookies ^^)

5. [/quote]You are deluded - keep to facts and I might have some respect for what you write; your opinions have no substance as far as I can see[/quote]

True. Everything i believe is based on speculation, otherwise it wouldn´t be a "belief" but "knowledge".
Same goes for you. Atm, you and a few others think that your beliefs are fact. But if you publish them in a Blog for everyone to read, you´re the one to back up your claims with substance (you may have done so and i may have not understood it, but if you want to reach all of us, you should be as blatant as possible, so the last white thrash guy can understand)

I think that´s all for the moment

Greetings from Germany

Newspaceman said...

Lets face facts here Dynamitrios, initially you found faith in your beliefs due to the fact that somehow a "pretty angry mob" would protect us.

When I contradicted this by means of proof - ie football violence - you became aggressive and accused me of being on some type of personal crusade. Furthermore, you dropped the angry mob slant in favour of a I just know it will be okay stance.

You agreed yourself that humanity was in danger of enslavement -

"And yes, I too believe that there is a ritual going on out there which is supposed to enslave humanity." -

yet you deride me for writing facts about it, not conjecture, not speculation, actual facts.

It then seems that you cannot explain your own nonsense and instead write more nonsense:


1 "I don´t intend to change anyones mind. That would be manipulative.
A rational discussion is something different from "I am right, you´re not"

You have already agreed that humanity is in danger and therefore that I am right. When we try to rationally discuss your "beliefs/argumants they are in fact not rational and therefore have no basis. What is wrong with trying to change someones mind if it is for the greater good.

2 - If you actually knew what you were talking about, your writing would not be subject to my interpretation - it would be logical and based on fact, instead of mumbo-jumbo.

3 - By virtue that you are happy that everything will just turn out okay without anyone bothering - and that you promote this speculation by way of commenting, then to me yes you do work for the other side.
What type of hashish are using for your cakes and I might partake if it is decent (which I doubt, or you would be smoking it rather than cooking with it). Why don't you learn to grow and free yourself a bit - I can give you some tips if you want (lol)

My beliefs about the enslavement of humanity is a fact and one you agreed with.

You missed the number 4 out - was that to square my thinking.

5 - What I write has substance - you have already agreed the basic principal of enslavement. What bits do you have difficulty with ?

cheers againlesbian3

FilmNoir23 said...

I have to concur with Brian...

I'm not really sure what your point is either???

If you want to read something "light" by all means go ahead...there must be trillions of blogs out there for that purpose. That is not the purpose or intent of what Brian is doing with his work. Although in fact, Brian often writes with a great deal of humor...

This is after all HIS platform with which to write in any way shape or form he desires. Are you a blog reviewer? Are you "critiquing" his style, tone or content???

I don't often like to get in the middle of message board banter like this personally (and I usually am HIGHLY suspect of those who start such threads) but I am seeing some real divisions taking place between people based on the material being "too heavy" or something...I find it laughable almost.

Serious topics in serious times deserve serious attention in my book...call it a Crusade if you wish but I for one applaud Brian for giving a shit.