Independent, or not ?

Dewars whisky - pronounced Jew-ares

Scottish independence is something I feel has more to do with a subtle, occult ritual in terms of the raising of an eventual one-world king, rather than something that will make much difference to the average Scottish person - given we are constantly bombarded with the news that our society is now global, certainly on a financial basis, and increasingly through the vehicle of worship of alleged mind controlled celebrities; and technology.

Infamous "satanist", Aleister Crowley, considered Scotland's Boleskin House to be "the focal point of the magical energies (also called the "93 Current") of the Aeon of Horus. In this way it is similar to Jerusalem in Judaism and Mecca in Islam"

From my April post, Pennies from Heaven :

Article in today's Daily Record stating that the Kirk (the Christian Church) wish to crown Prince Charles as King of Scots in a separate coronation should Scotland become independent :

The Church of Scotland proposals would see the heir to the throne become the first monarch to be crowned north of the Border since his namesake Charles II in 1651. First Minister Alex Salmond has pledged Scotland will keep the Queen if there is a Yes vote next year.

From today's BBC, Scottish Independence : Kirk approves separate coronations :

The Church of Scotland's ruling General Assembly has approved a call to crown monarchs in both England and Scotland, should Scotland becomes independent.

Its annual gathering said a separate ceremony would symbolise a monarch's role as King or Queen of Scots.

Reverend Sally Foster-Fulton said it would give "an opportunity for people of all faiths and no faith to create together this civic occasion".

Cast of Balamory - Scottish childrens TV programme

The civic occasion for all, that Reverend Foster-Fulton refers to, will be carried out on the Stone of Destiny. It's, if it is the real deal, currently stashed at Edinburgh Castle, having been returned to Scotland on the 101st day of 1951 - 11th April, after repatriation from England the previous year's Christmas Day. It went back to England, but was returned here on St. Andrew's Day 1996. That's the same Saint Andrew who's bones were prayed over by the Pope and now disgraced, exiled homosexual, Cardinal O' Brien, just after the Pontiff's historic and unprecedented meeting with HM the Queen, head of the Church of England, at Royal Holyrood Place in the shadow of extinct volcano, Arthur's Seat. Some say that Edinburgh city centre's extinct volcano, Arthur's Seat, resembles the Egyptian sphinx. Edinburgh Castle is built on the volcanic plug.

Jimmy Savile, immaculate in many colours, meets Cardinal O' Brien

Some say too that the Stone of Destiny is Jacob's  pillow stone. Jacob laid his head on the stone and dreamt of meeting God, who told him "Also your descendants shall be as the dust of the earth; you shall spread abroad to the west and the east, to the north and the south; and in you and in your seed all the families of the earth shall be blessed".

Also from wiki :

Some Scottish legends surrounding the Stone of Scone, traditionally used for coronations of Scottish kings in the High Middle Ages, have identified this stone with the Stone of Jacob. Supposedly the Stone of Jacob was brought to Ireland by the prophet Jeremiah and from thence to Scotland.

These legends also feature prominently in British Israelism, a set of beliefs that consider the British monarchy as the legitimate heir to the ancient Israelites. From 1308 to 1996, the Stone of Scone - identified with the Stone of Jacob - rested in the Royal throne of England at Westminster

British Israelism is something that deeply interests me, the notion that the British monarchy are God's "chosen ones", the heirs to the ancient Israelites. British Israel proponents often point to King James 6th and Ist, Bible reviser and promoter, claim that "The Lord has made me King over Israel" and his Jacobus gold coin which states the Biblical prophecy "I will make of them one nation". He certainly believed in the divine right of kings. 

Something that the Kirk were due to discuss, but have not, were the claims made in a ten page report called, The inheritance of Abraham ? A report on the Promised Land , which I covered in my post Crypto Jew-ology .The report has apparently been amended although originally contained the notion that :

Possession of any land is clearly conditional. The question that arises is this: Would the Jewish people today have a fairer claim to the land if they dealt justly with the Palestinians?"

Biblical promises about the land of Israel were never intended to be taken literally, or as applying to a defined geographical territory

Rather :

They are a way of speaking about how to live under God so that justice and peace reign, the weak and poor are protected, the stranger is included, and all have a share in the community and a contribution to make to it.

The 'promised land' in the Bible is not a place, so much as a metaphor of how things ought to be among the people of God. This 'promised land' can be found - or built - anywhere.
 

More Balamory

This week the Kirk approved gay ministers at their annual assembly.

In 2008, then British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, son of a minister, spoke at the christian gathering, utilising the platform to outline his vision for a "global society governed by a shared moral sense" (BBC News):

And we find that from the timeless wisdom of all the great religions - from which billions across the world derive daily inspiration - there is a consistent ethical core that propels us to act: encapsulated in the golden rule that informs not just Christianity and Judaism but also Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism and Islam - showing that we are not moral strangers but there is a shared moral sense common to us all

Reverend Sally Foster-Fulton was maybe thinking of that "coming together" under a "golden rule" in her aforementioned quote: "opportunity for people of all faiths and no faith to create together this civic occasion", in regard to a future coronation ?

Remember that King James was crowned in Scotland, before England, and that, according to practioners of magick like Crowley, ritual is at the very heart of their undertakings.

cheers

 

Light-bringers

Following on from yesterday's post, some people speculate there is a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy at large in the world today - a conspiracy which indeed appears to have been previously industrious. Basically, the "jews" and the freemasons are working together, in cahoots, for world dominance. If we take it at face value then surely, in terms of freemasonry, Scotland is an "Is-ra-el" - a spiritual homeland.

Yesterday's post - Crypto Jew-ology - noted the Scottish Kirk's report on the "real" Israel and it's treatment of the people of Palestine, something that is to be discussed at the General Assembly along with homosexuality. One gets the impression from many recent developments, for example the purge on the "scourge of football related sectarianism", that Scotland is being engineered to be a place of great tolerance of others, a veritable "promised land" - just like the one envisaged in the Church's report. That's not to forget the "green-ness" of the place as we strive to offset alleged human-made "climate change" with wind farms, low carbon emissions, etc. etc. Pioneers, so to speak.

Freethinkers ?

Back in 2008, then British Prime Minister, Scottish Gordon Brown - who's father was a  Church minister - spoke at the Kirk's General Assembly. He used the platform to outline his vision for a "global society governed by a shared moral sense" (BBC News). The full transcript of his speech used to be available but has now vanished, however one can glean the sentiments from this short out-take:

And we find that from the timeless wisdom of all the great religions - from which billions across the world derive daily inspiration - there is a consistent ethical core that propels us to act: encapsulated in the golden rule that informs not just Christianity and Judaism but also Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism and Islam - showing that we are not moral strangers but there is a shared moral sense common to us all:

And from these common precepts of the world’s great religions, we can - perhaps for the first time - move from old battlegrounds where religions confronted often each other to a higher common ground where people of all religions can unite around what binds them together. 

Then there's Gordon in India, whilst Chancellor, in 2007 (BBC News):

"It is time to formally recognise on a more consistent and regular basis the reality of this emerging new world order."



Then there's Gordon now; 2013. It appears he has joined the advisory board of a charity called Chime for Change which promotes the "empowerment of women". As such he is due to hit the stage on June 1st with none other that Beyonce Knowles (mail on line). I touched on Beyonce last month - here - when she mysteriously managed to pick Princess Eugenie out at random from a 20,000 throng whilst urging her to chant "to the left, to the left". Beyonce is of course in cahoots with Jay-Z, their "left hand path" sentiments can perhaps be gleaned from the images below.

Whilst personally I am unsure how exactly woman need more "empowerment", or exactly what it actually manifests itself as - surely not Beyonce ?, apparently the roots of  gender-equalness can be traced back as far as 1760, to the Scottish Enlightenment, a time of "new ideas in literature, science and medicine". So say Glasgow's Centre for Gender History according to this BBC report, which claims that in the Highlands of Scotland, pre-enlightenment, "there still existed an archaic and violent 'code of manhood' whereby men, likely to be intoxicated and with few rules to follow, affirmed their social status, settled disputes and restored family honour through violence.".
 

Gangster Jay Z, minus hos and bitches

From Terrorism and the Illuminati :

All the leading philosophers of the Enlightenment were Freemasons, or members of the Illuminati, and assisted in propagating its goals. Therefore, through the influence of Lurianic Kabbalah, they fostered the idea that humanity is progressing through ever higher stages of development, which would culminate in the rule of “reason”, and “freedom”, meaning the full emancipation from the tyranny of “superstition” of religion.

From wiki Age of Enlightenment :

In the 18th-century, influential thinkers as Francis Hutcheson, Adam Smith and David Hume, paved the way for the modernization of Scotland and the entire Atlantic world...On the one hand, historians agree that the famous leaders of the Enlightenment included Freemasons such as Montesquieu, Voltaire, Pope, Horace Walpole, Sir Robert Walpole, Mozart, Goethe, Frederick the Great, Benjamin Franklin, and George Washington.

From last week's Scotland on Sunday (admittedly penned by an anti-gay in the church, fairly right wing, Catholic - but written from the heart), Egotists of the enlightenment wreaked destruction on mankind:

"The Pseudo-Enlightenment has long been a totemic, if ill-defined, phenomenon in the liberal worldview...Beyond the self-serving attempt to confect an opposing moral order to the Judaeo-Christian ethic, however, that disastrous 18th-century aberration exercises a real and malign influence on society today...While there was a woolly, Deist component in much Enlightenment thought, it was a speculative, freemasonic esotericism, with Gnostic undertones, that represented a complete departure from Christian spirituality."...Technological distractions cannot forever divert society from recognising the futility of such an existence. The Enlightenment’s political legacy has exhausted its credibility; it is time to revisit everything it destroyed and initiate a process of reconstruction.

From wiki, re Lucifer, the "light bringer":

Luciferianism is a belief system that venerates the essential characteristics that are affixed to Lucifer. The tradition, influenced by Gnosticism, usually reveres Lucifer not as the Devil, but as a liberator or guiding spirit or even the true god as opposed to Jehovah.

cheers